Boortz [1] today makes note of the Weekly Standard article I posted over the weekend. Says Neal…
“Maybe I can understand why much of the media is giving this story scant attention. If you’ve poured so much energy into saying that Bush lied when he said that Iraq was a hotbed of terrorist activity, how, then, can you promote the news stories which show that Bush wasn’t lying? If you have been making the false charge that Bush said that Saddam was a part of the 9/11 attack, how can you then present evidence that this statement might have been true if, in fact, Bush had ever uttered it?”
But you read that info here, didn’t you?
No liberal lean to the press, eh?