I note Baldilocks, today, noting the Mike Nifong case.. [1]. a case that DavidL has done so well in tracking. I have always said, that the idea was about getting himself reelected. I’ve also suggested repeatedly that the implications of this misdeed are quite deep. Baldilocks brings an interesting perspective to the field, however… one I’d not thought of:
Know this. There are many black people who will jump at the chance to “get back at” white people for the wrongs done to them and their ancestors because of race, even if the individual white person(s) have done nothing. Even some of those same black people who call themselves Christians hold to “the sins of the father” notion–I’m even related to some who hold this belief. That’s part of what this post [2] was about.
Indeed, some blacks [3]–and, notably, some who aren’t mostly black [4]–wanted to punish the Duke lacrosse players without a trial. Back in the day, this was called ‘lynching.’
I think that Nifong counted on this phenomenon, but is not intelligent enough to have thought things out far enough to a logical conclusion. Getting reelected was his immediate goal and other things regarding the rape allegation–the line-up irregularities, the DNA problems and the fact that one of the accused, Reade Seligmann, had an air-tight alibi–could be worked out later. Or so thought someone as cynical and short-sighted as Nifong appears to be.
So now, Nifong will pay for his shortcomings as an individual, but what of the rest of us? By playing into the stereotypes that too many have for white, black, men, women, rich and poor, Nifong has done all of us–and those of other races–a great injury. Nifong’s dubious legacy–along with that of the O.J. Simpson jurors–is that it has made it that much harder for any of us to get real justice when we have been wronged in reality.
A valid point, well written.