A Memphis televisoin station breathlessly reports that a man fought-off , and averted, a would be robbery. Breitbart has the video.
Yet strangely missing from this report is just how this would victim fought-off an attemped armed robbery. Did an unarmed citizen simply bite the would be robber, or more likely was the citizen armed? I suspect the latter. The MSM loves to report when firearms used for bad purpose but simply refuses to report benificial uses of firearms. Wonder why?
