Eric Florack on January 9th, 2025

In the scary light of the fires in the Los Angeles area the last couple of days, it’s time for us to take inventory:

* No water reservoirs after the Democrats have been turning down such plans for years. They even turned down desalinization plants that were to be used as a water source. Therefore, no water to put out fires with.

* Even assuming they had water to put out fires with, they’re short on equipment and manpower because LAFD has had their budget cut by the cities Democrat run administration to the tune of 17.7 million dollars.

* The Topanga canyon fire particularly, the locals tell me was likely started in the homeless encampment there. It’s a sanctuary city of course and the newly imported Democrat voters are now living in those homeless encampments with people who have lost their homes because they don’t have enough income to cover homeownership and the taxes attached thereto.

*Where is the Democrat mayor of LA during all this? She’s on a taxpayer funded junket to Africa. At least she’s the right color. Got to check those politically correct boxes. (As an aside, this idiot was on Joe Biden’s short list for VP…)

* Oh speaking of politically correct boxes, the city fire chief in LA? A gay woman. Maybe instead of trying to fight “toxic masculinity” they brought in somebody who knew how to fight fires? Just a thought.

Eric Florack on January 7th, 2025

The January 6, 2025 certification of Trump’s election victory is the first time in fifty-two years that no Democrats challenged the certification of a GOP victory in a presidential election. Dems in the House challenged the results in 1981, 1985, 1989, 2001, 2005, & 2017.

Some of our friends still haven’t gotten the message about the establishment GOP. Take Kruiser, just this morning:

“Nobody outside of The New York Times Opinion section and the Biden White House thinks that Liz Cheney is a principled person. “

Well, Steve, I wouldn’t say nobody.

Let’s consider the establishment Republicans
who have been tolerating her, and even encouraging her, all this time. I even personally know one that’s been praising her as a principled person.

They are precisely what’s been holding the GOP back, since before Reagan.



Eric Florack on January 6th, 2025
Eric Florack on January 5th, 2025

Here we have a picture of Jill Biden leaving the vote booth on November 5th. This was sent to me by a reader.
First, it is remarkable that she’s not absentee voting.
Secondly, I can’t help but wonder, as does my (here nameless) correspondent, if the color of her outfit wasn’t a pointed message.

Eric Florack on January 4th, 2025
Tis is an amazing interview of Pierre Poilievre by Jordan Petersen.  You will notice almost at once that he is making the very same points about Canada that Donald Trump has been making here in the ‘states. All over the world, the people… the average Joe and Jane, are fed up with what’s been happening.  As you will see.

I’ll tell you something else… Liberal heads are going to explode over this interview.

Eric Florack on January 1st, 2025
Here’s a peek at the aftermath of the events early this morning on Bourbon Street in New orleans. President Trump called this an act of pure evil and he said absolutely corrected this.

I warn you, it’s a gruesome scene.

It’s worth noting that the name of the perpetrator has not been released as yet.

I will leave to you to consider the history of these kinds of attacks, particularly recently as to why authorities there are playing that one very close to the vest.

Update:

The suspect accused of plowing a truck through a crowd on Bourbon Street early Wednesday morning has been identified by a law enforcement source as 42-year-old Shamsud Din Jabbar.

Yeah, that’s what I thought. If it’s a white guy, they will invariably name the suspect before the screaming dies.

But when it’s anybody else, islamist, transsexual, one minority or another, it’s usually something on the order of 24 hours before the suspect is known to the public.

Eric Florack on December 29th, 2024

Over at PJ media, Greg Byrnes does a bit of a retrospective on Jimmy Carter on the occasion of his passing:

Once in office, his popularity gradually began to fade, partly because of his drift to the Left. He supported the legalization of abortion by the courts, and his first act in office was to pardon all Vietnam War draft dodgers. In some ways, it was the McGovern agenda without the McGovern political baggage. His aides were often inexperienced in Washington’s ways, and like the only other engineer elected president, Herbert Hoover, Carter had an unfounded faith in his ability to both lead and micromanage his administration.

While in office, he created the Department of Energy and the Department of Education. In a hotly contested decision, he gave away the American-built Panama Canal. He faced an energy crisis sparked by war in the Middle East and an Arab oil embargo, which Carter called the “moral equivalent of war.” 

But critics saw his address to the nation on the energy crisis while wearing a sweater as a sign of weakness in American global leadership. He seemed to ask Americans to get by with less and lower national expectations. In a struggling economy, he provided the equivalent of $11 billion to bail out a failing Chrysler Corporation as Japanese car imports flooded the struggling American automobile market.

In his famous “malaise speech” towards the end of his term, he epitomized the economic malaise the nation was experiencing under his leadership with high gas prices, inflation, and slow economic growth. 


High gas prices inflation and slow economic growth. Sounds awfully familiar, doesn’t it?

And it should be noted that the bailout of Chrysler handed up some 40 years later I’m out into nothing as Chrysler’s new owners are about ready to pull the plug on the place.

The Carter administration record was bad enough that it resulted in two landslides for Ronald Reagan.

The greatest of his sins in my opinion was the creation of the federal department of education, which further the intrusion of government into the educational process. As I have asked several times in these spaces, does anybody truly expect a taxpayer funded government-run education system to properly fill the minds full of mush with the true intention of the founders as regards limited government?

I feel, and will express here,, a sympathy for his passing. But in fairness one cannot ignore the rest of it. The old saying about those who don’t learn from history will repeat it seems to apply here, in spades.

One respondent in the back and forth in some of my online conversations late this afternoon, suggested that at least he was a better president than Bill Clinton. My response was to quip about that’s not all that high a bar.

Still, it must be observed that although his presidency was problematic, one never doubted his sincerity. And that’s far more than I can say about a goodly number of presidents in my lifetime.

Eric Florack on December 26th, 2024
Just a few thoughts that I’ll pass along here…

* The number of people telling us that they are moving to Canada because Donald Trump was elected interests me for two reasons. First, Trudeau is about to be replaced by a conservative in the upcoming election, and why aren’t they moving to Mexico? Racist much?

* And about that… Shouldn’t Babs Streisand and Cher have moved out of the country by now?

* A fascinating little tidbit about Trump’s victory… He is the first Republican candidate to beat not one but two Democrat candidates in the same election.

* Is the shooting of a healthcare CEO, a tacit admission Obamacare didn’t work?

* A while ago, I suggested that assuming Trump and on the nomination in 2016 that whatever Republican won the nomination would get the same treatment from the Democrats the Trump did. I took it at the time as proof that it wasn’t really about Trump but about any opposition. What we are now seeing in reaction to Elon Musk bears this out.

Eric Florack on December 25th, 2024
I’d like you to pay very close attention to what’s going on in this scene. I’m sure you’ve all watched it before, but this time I want you to pay very close attention to Linus.

There is a subtle point to this scene, which I’m afraid most people miss. I’m convinced that Charles Schulz did this intentionally.

We all know that Linus very seldom cast aside his security blanket. it was always in one hand or the other.

But notice what happens when he steps out into the middle of the stage to
deliver the Christmas gospel. He puts it down on the floor. It’s one of the very few times he does that in any of the Peanuts animations.

A security blanket is certainly something that helps its carrier deal with the pressures of life, and the insecurities we all face.

But the change occurs when he recites the gospel. It’s as if the gospel he’s reciting, the speech he’s delivering, is the one factor the Linus is absolutely sure of.

Charles Schulz was no fool.

He understood subtlety. As I say, I am convinced he did this intentionally to send a message.

Merry Christmas, folks.

Eric Florack on December 25th, 2024
Eric Florack on December 25th, 2024
For every new administration, it is important that the team is firing on all cylinders from the moment the president takes the oath of office.

This time around however it becomes far more important. Consider the working factors involved.

The president has a strong majority in both the house and the Senate. This of itself might be important in other years, but this year that’s a bit of a question mark because of the number of establishment Republicans amongst long-term Republican seat holders.

There is, however, a rather important factor which has not been lost on anyone watching the high level Democrats in burning in the news. The circular firing squad that is the Democratic party of the moment gives the president and his team serious advantages not to be had at any other point during the electoral cycle. They need to jump on this in a real hurry before they get their act together.

Eric Florack on December 24th, 2024
Edtor’s note:
For over 20 years now, I’ve found my inbox filled with messages from longtime readers who wonder if I’m going to be re-posting “A Bithead’s Christmas”, and begging me to do so.
As I believe I’ve told you in previous years, I get more email about this one single post, these 2900 or so words, than I have about anything else written here. And it happens every single year. Either this one post is particularly good, or the rest of it is comparatively bad. You’ll forgive me if in my vanity, I believe the former. I take that they’re using Email, instead of simply leaving comments, to mean that I’ve struck a very personal and private nerve. Touching people in that fashion is a very rare thing, and one I take very seriously, so the answer to the question is “Yes, of course I’ll run it again”.

Understand going in, it may not be politically correct. I seek no absolution, no forgiveness, for it’s being overtly Christian in nature, any more than I seek absolution or forgiveness for anything else that I put into these spaces. It is what it is, because Christmas is what it is, and because I speak my mind on the topic at hand, whatever that is.

Christmas, and thereby, Christianity itself, has been going on for a little over 2000 years, in spite of all the naysayers, protesters and government regulations that history has managed to toss up in those 2000- plus years. It does so, because at the core of it all, is a message…….. a message that all the naysayers, protesters and government hacks will never understand, much less conquer. It is a message that will survive the ravages of time, government, and liberals, fascists, and anything and everything else, long after you and I are no longer even a memory in this world. The Christmas message, you see, is eternal, and ever green.

(Evergreen. I am suddenly struck with the symbolism here)There is something of a journalistic precedent for this as well. . . I do not pretend to hold myself quite so high in the world as these media outlets who have such traditions as “Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus”… but they’ve been getting away with such things for well over 100 years, so I suppose I can get away with it, here.

One of the things that man has always found fascinating about the Christmas story, is that you can reread it all your life, and every time you reread it, you find a new truth buried within it, so perhaps that’s WHY we get away with repeating such stories. It’s perhaps where such traditions come from.
So with all this in mind, and with the hope of helping you find new meaning in this season… and peace… a personal peace… in these troubled times, I will offer once again this year:

A Bithead’s Christmas

I find myself wanting to take more seriously, the challenge of writing to the subject of Christmas, today, than I have in years past. It’s not clear in my mind as to why, but this isn’t unusual… I never really do have a firm grip on why I want to attack a subject in these spaces. In fact, the writing of a coulmn for me has becomes more an effort of exploring a subject; the codification of random thoughts. The act of putting those thoughts into words on a screen allows me to think about, and RE-think about the subject at hand. My thoughts on a given subject often do not fully take shape until such time as I’ve re-written them twice. Often, indeed… usually, the ideas are already there, waiting to be cast into words, but not fully defined until the act of sitting down and typing them out. I suppose this subject is no exception.To this effort, some blogs, this time of year will quote the great Gospels of Christ’s arrival, and expound on that. And that’s worthy, and right. Some others will take the secular angle of the holiday and go off on that. That too, is fine, though frankly it’s always for me missed the core of the topic, a little.But not me, for either of those tacks. Not this year. I’m going to go off the beaten path, for this post, at least in context of this blog, given it’s Christmas, and off the beaten path in terms of the Liturgical calendar, given it’s me. I’m going to stick with the meaning of Christmas, but to point it up, I’m going to turn to something a little later… about 30 years later… for my subject. I trust you’ll see why when I’m done.This story is in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. We’ll use Luke’s version for the purpose.

In Luke 18 it reads:

15 Now they were bringing even infants to him that he might touch them; and when the disciples saw it, they rebuked them. 16 But Jesus called them to him, saying, “Let the children come to me, and do not hinder them; for to such belongs the kingdom of God. 17 Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.”

Now, all three versions add a little something to the story, and I suggest you read them yourself to get it all.
Most times that Christians hear this text or read it, a child is being baptized. The apparently intended thrust of reading it in those situations is to make a loose connection with the Children being accepted by Christ. And, that’s a valid angle for the story. But, think about the story line, here, so you can get the flavor of what I’m going to describe to you. There’s a far bigger angle that many miss.

See, Christ has been playing “superstar” for a while, now. He’s been attracting flat out huge crowds wherever he goes. The disciples are starting to become concerned for the (human) well being of Christ. Children are, then as now, a source of some stress to adults already under stress, so the disciples decide, wordlessly to give the Lord a break. But Jesus says.. “Hey… No.. Let ’em come… It’s OK. ”

Apparently, seeing some remaining resistance in their eyes, he reinforces the command with a statement that must have shaken them badly. “It’s to the likes of these as belongs the Kingdom of God.”

Now, It’s not hard for us to imagine what’s going on in the minds of the disciples…. They must have felt a little put back… While not saying so, they must have figured they had an inside track to Heaven. (Shrug) It’s human nature.

The passages don’t record if they said anything, but you just know what they’re thinking, here… “Comon, Jesus… We’re tryin’ to give you a break here! And you elevate these lowest of low, mere children, into the ownership of heaven? You raise a polite nothing to a path to heaven and eternity? What’s THAT about?”And you know, Jesus knows it too. He knows full well what they’re thinking, because watch what he comes back with: “I’ll tell you the truth;”, he says, “Unless you change… Unless you transform, and accept the kingdom of heaven like a child, you’ll never enter it.”

But what does he mean, here? He’s talking, I’m afraid, about how you lose touch with happiness and the sense of wonder, as you become an adult. That loss prevents us from seeing the Kingdom of heaven as it is.

For most of us, the happiest times of our lives was when we were children. When we’re younger, we have less in the way of cares, and troubles. Let’s admit, too, that as we get older, we become aware of, and allow more and more sadness into our lives.It’s true; It’s a hard world out there, and being adults we’ve come to understand this, in a way of understanding that only long exposure and experience… and lots of scar tissue, can bring.It seems that every year we have more worries and concerns.

Oh, yeah, do we EVER worry. We worry about our health, and those concerns increase with advancing age. We worry about our jobs, about our investments, our savings, about the future in general. Retirement is a concern. Will we have enough? We’re too fat, we’re too skinny.

We’re too tall, we’re too short, our once wavy hair is still waving… Only, it’s waving bye-bye. We worry about the future our kids will have and the normal growing up problems, but we also worry about the future that we’ve left our kids. We look at the news, and we wonder what kind of a world have we left them? We even worry if we worry too much.We’ve seen marriages and relationships we thought would pass the test of time, pass away, instead. Things we had hoped would come to pass, didn’t, and those we’d not dreamed, in our wildest nightmares would happen, did. We see loved ones die. Jobs disappear. Hearts get broken.

And friends, those are just the hum-drum… The everyday worries that every generation has had, since Cain bopped his brother’s bean with a rock. Then you get into the problems particular to us and our times; AIDS, oil shortages, cancer, drugs, the way our own technology seems to be spiraling out of our control…

And Islamofacists.

Ah, yes, there’s nothing at all, to my mind, like the specter of 3000 plus people dying on national television, in Washington, NY and Pennsylvania… while we watch, to remind us that we’re not in control.And yes…. it’s all about control, if you think on it for long. All these things I’ve listed are worries about things we cannot control, try as we might.

The list of these reverses, these scars, gets longer as the years progress, and it starts eventually, to break down the positive outlook in every one of us… Each according to their ability to resist. Each step, each worry, each bit of emotional scar tissue, if you will, moves us farther away from the relative joy of our comparatively carefree childhood.

By now the sharper among you will notice where I’m going with this; This is where Christmas comes in. This is why Christmas holds a special place in our hearts, and our traditions.

You see, even for the not-so-religious, it is a time of renewal of our fragile human spirit. All of the hurts, small and large, become less pronounced, and fade under the soft glow of the lights, the candles, the fireplace, and the smile of the children.

Have you ever noticed that it’s the children, in fact, that do us the most healing? Christmas, it’s said, is for the children. Presidential speechwriter and WSJ columnist Peggy Noonan noted recently about some of the qualities of children:

“They are susceptible to wonder. A child can look at a red toy car in the red-green glow of Christmas tree lights and imagine an entire lifetime.

A child can play with a new doll and smell good things being cooked and hear sweet music and it can make that child imagine that life is good, which gives her a template for good, a category for good; it helps her know good exists. This knowledge comes in handy in life; those who do not receive it, one way or another, are sadder than those who do.”

Of course, we move away from that ability as we grow older. Our long experience has hardened us to the realities of the world around us, and perhaps jaded our point of view. But here comes Christmas, which gives us, individually and collectively, the chance of looking at the world through the wonder-filled eyes of a child once again… Becoming childlike ourselves in the process, and becoming healed and renewed.

The experience is a far deeper one for those who have accepted the Christmas promise, and it’s meaning. Reacting to that promise includes allowing someone else to run the controls of our lives. Remember I said it was all about control? Well, I want you to think about the features of being a child.

It was Randall Jarrell, I think, who once quipped:

“One of the most obvious facts about grownups to a child is that they have forgotten what it is like to be a child.”

Well, let’s remember.

You’re NOT in control of much of anything. Someone who knows better, and is by far more powerful than we, is running things. And looking back, I’m sure most of us would conclude that having that situation back would be of comfort to us. Haven’t we all wished to resign from the world of adulthood at times?

I guess this would be a good place to slip in a parallel story.

Consider the fictional person of Ebeneezer Scrooge. Think about how the story develops;

He’s had some serious emotional setbacks in early life… and those have become a self-feeding, never ending circle by the time we meet him, 7 years after his best friend’s death.

All these setbacks have made him cold, and hard, and for all outward appearances, non-feeling. He’s covered with emotional scar tissue. Being hard, is his way of dealing with what he cannot control.

Only after his overnight experience do all these cares get swept away, along with his anger of not being able to control his situation…. The realization comes to him that he never really WAS in control in the first place, so stop fretting about it all… Think about what are essentially the first words out of his mouth as he realizes that the weight of his worries.. Not unlike worries you and I have had, are gone;

“I’m as light as a feather….” The weight of that scar tissue… And all the concerns they represent having been lifted off his shoulders…

“…and as giddy as a Schoolboy!”

Like.
A.
Child.

“I’ll tell you the truth”, he said, “Unless you change.. Unless you transform, and accept the kingdom of heaven like a child, you’ll never enter it.”

Amazing parallels, aren’t they?

I’m reliably informed that Charles Dickens was not as a rule what one would call very religious. Yet, in looking at the parallels in these two story lines, I must wonder in all honesty if he didn’t have some help with “A Christmas Carol”.

Now, you’ll notice I took some liberty with the way the Biblical text was quoted. Some liberty, I say, but not very much, really, since it’s long been pointed out by Bible scholars that the word that earlier versions of the text had as ‘change’ were really translated from the ancient Greek word for “transform”.

This is a major point, because it demonstrates what the first step is, and whose it is… yours.

And no, change and transformation are not the same thing. The best description I’ve ever thought of to explain the difference between the two, runs along these lines:If I take a rock, and in the other hand I take a large hammer, and I hit the rock with the hammer, and break it, I’ve changed that rock. If I take that same rock, and take a small hammer and chisel, and very carefully, perhaps over a period of decades, sculpt that rock into a flower, I’ve still merely changed that rock.

Transformation, on the other hand, is when the rock itself, as a matter of responding to it’s own will, becomes a flower. And of course that’s beyond the normal power of the rock, by any standard we know.

What Christ therefore is saying is, that we must become children, as of a matter of our own will. Which is, as I say, impossible by any standard we know…. Which in turn leads us to the source of all things, who teaches us how, and gives us the power to do it.

You see, the externalities I mentioned, the lights, the fire, the children…and that which Dickens writes of… the giving, the being open to what joys are around us, and so on, helps toward the goal of understanding the Christmas promise, but it’s not the whole deal.

At the core of it all… (and this is a connection that, alas, many people never make…) is that the one whose birth is being celebrated every December the 25th, is the one who takes over that long list of worries. But understand, here…THAT’S WHY WE CELEBRATE!!

With those worries removed, lives get changed, hearts mended, child-like perspectives restored in a way that the lights, carols and greenery can never do on their own. And the newly remade Children find that the authority and responsibility and all the ponderous weight connected with them, are taken away by the one who said “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me”.

Now, I must warn you; There are those who will resist being told all of this… to the point of removing such joy as they find, wherever they may find it, often using the power of governments, and force of arms to have it removed from town squares and schools, mocking, persecuting and yes, even killing those responsible for the spreading of the news of this miracle.

It’s a sad truth, that a world used to darkness, you see, will continually fight to see the darkness continued.

That warning given, however, I will say to you also, that it’s no accident, Christmas being called the season of light, and that Christ is called the light of the world.

If I have one wish for this Christmas, it is that you will be open to the light…. With the wondering eyes of a child.

Well, this doesn’t come as anything of a surprise.

The problem with that whole scenario was that instead of believing the science, we believed the scientists. We somehow believed collectively, that the white lab coat shielded one from greed and averice, and the need to feel powerful.


As I’ve said before, bring me the head of Anthony Fauci.

By the way, if Behind The Black isn’t on your daily reading list, it should be.

Eric Florack on December 22nd, 2024
John Hindracker says this morning

“Joe Biden” was just a name on the ballot, served up because, as of 2020, he had wide name recognition but not a far-left image. A perfect combination! And one that did not require him to do anything at all, once in office. A vote for Biden was simply a vote for things as they were: a government trending always to the left, with trillions of dollars being dispensed by a benign bureaucracy–the real power in America, the fourth branch that is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution.

I think this narrative helps to explain why Democrats are so horrified at the prospect of a Trump presidency. Trump, a real, non-senile president? A president with a mandate from the voters to bring about important changes? A president who will re-assert control over the “fourth branch”? A president who won’t be a pawn in the hands of Washington insiders? A president who actually understands and carries out his duties under Article II? A president capable of standing up to the Washington establishment?

This is what passes for revolutionary change in our late-stage republic.

Indeed so John, and well said.

The obvious problems with the Biden administration and particularly with the incapacity of Biden himself, was the reason behind the illegalities, outright fraud and protectionism that was demonstrated by the Democrats and their lackeys in the mainstream media, for the last five years, now.

All of this resulted in the Democrats being handed their backsides in the most recent election. The fourth branch, otherwise known as the deep state, or if you prefer, the swamp, fully exposed itself during the Biden administration.

This resulted in Donald Trump being the first Republican nominee to beat two Democrat candidates in the same election, despite the news media and the pollsters saying that the election was a close one (and therein trying to create their own reality… and thus exposing themselves even further).

It’s going to be quite a while before any of them are seriously listened to again, by the majority of Americans. Oh, there will always be hangers on, people too emotionally invested in keeping the Democrats afloat. But their numbers will be comfortably low for at least a few election cycles.

A great thing, that…