Eric Florack on April 22nd, 2005

Bloomberg.com says:

April 22 (Bloomberg) — The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will vote May 12 on John Bolton’s nomination as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, a panel spokesman said.

Well, there ya go.  My guess here is that we’ll see him sent to the floor in spite of it all.

Tags:

The Sandiego Union-Tribune reports:

“CAMP PENDLETON – Camp Pendleton Marines reacted with glee this morning on learning that Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who once served at the base, was nominated by President Bush to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
‘We’re all standing a little bit taller after hearing the news that a Marine will hold the top job, and we’re very proud of his nomination,’ said Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson, director of public affairs at Camp Pendleton. ‘This is no surprise because he’s been a great Marine.’ “

This would be the very first Marine to hold the post.
I’ll be interested to see if any Democrats try to block this one.

Tags:

The Sandiego Union-Tribune reports:

“CAMP PENDLETON – Camp Pendleton Marines reacted with glee this morning on learning that Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who once served at the base, was nominated by President Bush to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
‘We’re all standing a little bit taller after hearing the news that a Marine will hold the top job, and we’re very proud of his nomination,’ said Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson, director of public affairs at Camp Pendleton. ‘This is no surprise because he’s been a great Marine.’ “

This would be the very first Marine to hold the post.
I’ll be interested to see if any Democrats try to block this one.

Tags:

The Sandiego Union-Tribune reports:

“CAMP PENDLETON – Camp Pendleton Marines reacted with glee this morning on learning that Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who once served at the base, was nominated by President Bush to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
‘We’re all standing a little bit taller after hearing the news that a Marine will hold the top job, and we’re very proud of his nomination,’ said Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson, director of public affairs at Camp Pendleton. ‘This is no surprise because he’s been a great Marine.’ “

This would be the very first Marine to hold the post.
I’ll be interested to see if any Democrats try to block this one.

Tags:

The Sandiego Union-Tribune reports:

“CAMP PENDLETON – Camp Pendleton Marines reacted with glee this morning on learning that Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who once served at the base, was nominated by President Bush to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
‘We’re all standing a little bit taller after hearing the news that a Marine will hold the top job, and we’re very proud of his nomination,’ said Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson, director of public affairs at Camp Pendleton. ‘This is no surprise because he’s been a great Marine.’ “

This would be the very first Marine to hold the post.
I’ll be interested to see if any Democrats try to block this one.

Tags:

The Sandiego Union-Tribune reports:

“CAMP PENDLETON – Camp Pendleton Marines reacted with glee this morning on learning that Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who once served at the base, was nominated by President Bush to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
‘We’re all standing a little bit taller after hearing the news that a Marine will hold the top job, and we’re very proud of his nomination,’ said Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson, director of public affairs at Camp Pendleton. ‘This is no surprise because he’s been a great Marine.’ “

This would be the very first Marine to hold the post.
I’ll be interested to see if any Democrats try to block this one.

Tags:

The Sandiego Union-Tribune reports:

“CAMP PENDLETON – Camp Pendleton Marines reacted with glee this morning on learning that Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who once served at the base, was nominated by President Bush to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
‘We’re all standing a little bit taller after hearing the news that a Marine will hold the top job, and we’re very proud of his nomination,’ said Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson, director of public affairs at Camp Pendleton. ‘This is no surprise because he’s been a great Marine.’ “

This would be the very first Marine to hold the post.
I’ll be interested to see if any Democrats try to block this one.

Tags:

The Sandiego Union-Tribune reports:

“CAMP PENDLETON – Camp Pendleton Marines reacted with glee this morning on learning that Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who once served at the base, was nominated by President Bush to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
‘We’re all standing a little bit taller after hearing the news that a Marine will hold the top job, and we’re very proud of his nomination,’ said Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson, director of public affairs at Camp Pendleton. ‘This is no surprise because he’s been a great Marine.’ “

This would be the very first Marine to hold the post.
I’ll be interested to see if any Democrats try to block this one.

Tags:

So says Daniel Gross:

The credit card industry presumes, based on happy experience, that Americans will borrow more money each quarter to support their spending habits, regardless of the direction of interest rates, and that enough consumers will be happy simply to pay off just enough debt to allow them to borrow more. But last quarter MBNA, to its apparent shock, found that “results were further impacted by unexpectedly high payment volumes from U.S. credit card customers,” and that “the payment volumes were particularly higher on accounts with higher interest rates.”

And Gross admits, even that the New Bankruptcy law had soemthing to do with this.

Gee, Dan… Ya THINK?

Tags:

Eric Florack on April 22nd, 2005

Vegas police have arrested the woman who claimed she found a finger in a bowl of Wendy’s Chili.

Apparently the charge is grand larceny, and is directly related to the Wendy’s case, though polcie aren’t saying much before their 1pm news conference…(5pm eastern)

Tags:

Eric Florack on April 22nd, 2005

Little Green Footballs notes the typical grave dancing going on at the all- love and lights Democratic Underground…

FlemingsGhost (1000+ posts) Thu Apr-21-05 10:21 PM

71. Incinerated to dust. Bitch of an occupational hazard, huh?

Rejoice!

There are nine less “Rambo” wanna-be assholes in the world.

There we have it, people… The Democratic party in all of it’s glory.

Tags:

Eric Florack on April 22nd, 2005

In doing some research yesterday, I ran across a comment I wrote over at Drezner’s along about Christmas before last. Given the recent votes in TX and CT the other day, it seems appropriate to re-post these thoughts here, for the purpose of stirring discussion. Remember, I am a cultural conservative, and that as such I consider that the laws should not over-ride the culture, given that the very purpose of government is to support and defend the culture that gave it life… and indeed that such government as failed to do that job, loses it’s moral authority to govern.


“‘A prohibition on homosexual unions wasn’t written into the constitution because such things were assumed, and therefore never legally defined.

Proof of these assumptions is easy enough to find.
It is interesting for example, that Jefferson, (arguably the biggest social liberal of the lot) thought homosexual acts to be worthy of hanging… (I commend Fawn Brodie’s Jefferson to your reading list) and yet he never indicated anything of the sort in his … our… documents.

Clearly, there was some assumptions made on the part of the founders in this area…. cultural assumptions.

And here, we walk a legal fine line, I fear.

Government, you see, does not operate inside a cultural vaccum. Rather, it exists inside a cultural context it must not run afoul of, lest it become irrelevant to the people it’s supposed to be governing. Yet, while law and government is a more exact science, culture is less so. And so, codification of the culture is problematic at best.

Given this, Jefferson, and the rest of the founders apparently took the attitude that their best tack would be to write laws and a framework that would at least not run afoul of the existing culture, without specifying without attempting to codify the boundires of that culture.

Dan, I think, is right insofar as such an amendment not passing, because it, unlike the remainder of the constitution, it attempts to define the social boundries of the culture it’s charged with governing.

But I wonder what it is then, that the culture has to protect itself, in the end, if not government.’

This is, it seems to me, the legal vs the cultural. And clearly the founders were making chocies based on cultural assumptions. This is today resulting in questions such as Holman W. Jenkins Jr, in the WSJ asks

“If marriage is a mere “legal” right, who can’t get married? If any two people have the right to the legal benefits of marriage, why not three people? Why not two brothers? Why not a man and his father?

It’s hard to see on what basis marriage could logically be denied to anybody. Right now, the state doesn’t ask if a man and woman are heterosexually inclined, if they love each other, if they intend to have children. Marriage largely regulates itself, with the exception being government efforts to prevent marriages intended solely to obtain a green card. But in the world ordained by the Massachusetts supreme court, wouldn’t the state be obliged to make sure two women who want to get married are really lesbians and not just two women trying to acquire the legal advantages of marriage? How else to stop marriage from becoming a right available to any group of people who simply want to organize their affairs as “married” persons?

Right now, the law makes no formal presumption about the sexual orientation of people getting married, just their gender: They have to be of opposite sexes. Yet that small stipulation seems to have succeeded, for the most part, in keeping marriage from becoming a mere contractual convenience. ”

I’ve already written at some length about all of this, incidental to the Canadian SC ruling last June.(02)

The problem is a bit more basic, even than a religious question in our increasingly secular society. At it’s root, this is a matter of which will triumph… law and government, or the culture that created said law and said government. Like it or not, the values being railed against by those seeking to install this travisty, are not simply religious values. They are also deep in the roots of our culture. The implications are simple enough to see, then…
-0-

Tags:

Eric Florack on April 22nd, 2005

Ah, yes that High-holy day of Anti-Americanism… “Earth day” is upon us.

I’m working today, but I plan to Celebrate Earth day tommrow.. by burning 40 gallons of gas in my Cross Country van. That’s about 800 miles of driving, folks. See a bit of the country, that way.

As to the gas and it’s price… a look at the real situation there tells the story of why I refuse to take ‘earth day’ seriously; A look at the people who set up this monster we’re all supposed to bow down to shows us a group of people who won’t allow refineries or domestic drilling, who demand something on the order of 50 or 60 diferent regional blends… supposedly in the interest of ‘clean air’.

Tags:

Eric Florack on April 22nd, 2005

Captain’s Quarters has some of last night’s developments up north. The Captain’s been keeping as good an eye on things up there as anyone on the web. Go read it and then come back.

–Read it? OK….

OK, like I said last week, Martin is burned toast, and so too is the liberal party, itself. There are now far too many leaks in this dike for Martin to plug, and this thing is gonna come crashing down with a fair force of water behind it… and Martin’s play for time last night will not work. There’s no question in my mind; We’ll see June elections.

But there seems to me other fallout, too.

In watching the CBC coverage last night…(Yeah, I know, I know…) an interesting shift at the CBC seems to be occurring. The tone is different at the CBC as of last night; The shift was to me rather dramatic; Now that the Liberals are toast, they seem to be leaning toward the NDP, and Jack Leighton, or so it seemed to me. They certainly, it seemed to me, tried to paint the picture that Canadian voters were doing so. They went to great lengths to play up Leigton’s call for Martin to remove the so-called suprise corporate tax cuts form Martin’s proposed budget, and get it out to the floor for a vote. Just what you’d expect from the socialist NDP, I suppose… Leighton has a history of never meeting a Job killing tax he didn’t like.

Still, this whole situation is a bonanza for Leighton of course, if he plays it right, and even without the CBC suddenly changing aim. No matter what happens, he and the NDP come out stronger, as those to the left end of the Canadian Liberal party seek a new home. It’s true, Leighton can only gain seats out of this, unless, as I say, he screws this up.

But despite the picture being painted here by the CBC, It’s Harper’s conservatives that really stand to gain. And that scares the living crap out of the socialists at the CBC. Or so I picked up last night.

But there’s other impacts here, too and far more than a simple shift in party loyalty among the Canadian Left. The wild card here, it seems to me, is the Bloc, and the entire question of Quebec. The Bloc is literally screaming that they were cheated in the most recent referendum on sovereignty, which if I recall right was in 1995 or ’96.. and the leader of the Bloc last night stood up and demanded Martin offer ..”an apology to the Quebec nation. ” (Emph mine)

Well, gee, boys and girls… Guess what these Bloc people are planning on doing? No matter who gets the seats, the Bloc will be pushing for yet another referendum on sovereignty, and this time they’ll be table pounding even worse than before (Bad as they got the last time out), and will demand things the rest of Canada simply will not even consider, particularly given the rise of the Conservatives in the wake of the Liberal’s behavior and their resulting fall from grace.

I dare to suggest to you something I’ve not seen others do….that the Canadian federation itself is threatened.

Let that sink in a moment.

I offer congrats to the Liberal party of Canada; If they have not utterly destroyed Canada as a country; they’ve come damnedably close to it.

There’s impact here for the US as well… and Americans should be watching all of this with a wary eye, I think. If the liberals have been successful in destroying the federation, then it seems to me we here in the ‘States have a major security issue on our hands.  Canadian border security has long been non-existent. For good or ill, this was a conscious choice on the part of both countries. Of late there have been tensions between Canada and the US as regards Canada’s immigration policy, given that because of the lack of real security along the US Canadian border, Canadian immigration policy becomes the Defacto, back-door US policy.

What will that Canadian border policy become when Canada is itself in such disarray?

If the Canadian federation goes belly up, our security situation, along our largest border becomes dire, indeed. We need to prepare for that eventuality.

Update:
One reader writes me today with the comment that he was a bit shocked Martin hadn’t tried to toss Cretien to the hounds last night.

I noted that too, but I take that as damage control, within Quebec. After all, a goodly amount of the reason Martin has a job is because of the Quebec voter… who if you’ll recall, supported Cretien pretty strongly. Consider Martin’s problem, here. As unpopular has Martin is elsewhere in Canada, he’d be in even worse trouble overall if he alienated French speaking Canadians by being seen as dumping on Cretien, to save himself.

(Re-edited for clarity)

Tags:

Eric Florack on April 21st, 2005

Man Without Qualities Robert Musil, who really HAS to get his permalinks fixed in the CSS, writes today regarding the 9th Circus Circuit Court of Appeals, and how they have a tendency to get overturned 9 to nothing quite a bit.

The article goes into some rather heavy detail, but there’s a rather disturbing pattern in the type of cases they’re losing. In every case, the rulings they hand down swing wildly left.

RTWT

Tags: