John Hawkins and Right Wing News has taken a vote of a pile of bloggers asking the question who would be the most desireable candidates for the Republican nomination of 2008.

Yes, I was asked to participate. Thanks, John for including BitsBlog in that who’s who of the right side of the ‘sphere. The results are interesting. Go see.

Tags:

John Hawkins and Right Wing News has taken a vote of a pile of bloggers asking the question who would be the most desireable candidates for the Republican nomination of 2008.

Yes, I was asked to participate. Thanks, John for including BitsBlog in that who’s who of the right side of the ‘sphere. The results are interesting. Go see.

Tags:

John Hawkins and Right Wing News has taken a vote of a pile of bloggers asking the question who would be the most desireable candidates for the Republican nomination of 2008.

Yes, I was asked to participate. Thanks, John for including BitsBlog in that who’s who of the right side of the ‘sphere. The results are interesting. Go see.

Tags:

John Hawkins and Right Wing News has taken a vote of a pile of bloggers asking the question who would be the most desireable candidates for the Republican nomination of 2008.

Yes, I was asked to participate. Thanks, John for including BitsBlog in that who’s who of the right side of the ‘sphere. The results are interesting. Go see.

Tags:

John Hawkins and Right Wing News has taken a vote of a pile of bloggers asking the question who would be the most desireable candidates for the Republican nomination of 2008.

Yes, I was asked to participate. Thanks, John for including BitsBlog in that who’s who of the right side of the ‘sphere. The results are interesting. Go see.

Tags:

John Hawkins and Right Wing News has taken a vote of a pile of bloggers asking the question who would be the most desireable candidates for the Republican nomination of 2008.

Yes, I was asked to participate. Thanks, John for including BitsBlog in that who’s who of the right side of the ‘sphere. The results are interesting. Go see.

Tags:

The Democrat freindly Boston Globe has released a story depicting Hillary Clinton as a member of the heretofore unheard -of “religious left”.

This is nothing less than a cynical bit of political positioning… as bad as I’ve ever seen… and a direct response to getting their collectivist butts kicked in the last election.

In a speech at a fund-raising dinner for a Boston-based organization that promotes faith-based solutions to social problems, Clinton said there has been a “false division” between faith-based approaches to social problems and respect for the separation of church of state.

“There is no contradiction between support for faith-based initiatives and upholding our constitutional principles,” said Clinton, a New York Democrat who often is mentioned as a possible presidential candidate in 2008.”

Reynolds seems to think this is sincerity on her part. Comon, Glenn.. at what point in her life other than when she claimed “We ARE the president” has this person EVER been ‘sincere’? (And I use the term ‘person’ in the most abjectly loose sense possible to the language..)

I mean, this should be a fairly easy romp through the net… can anyone find Hillary making argumments against Faith Based initiatives previously, gang? Can EVERYONE find such without breaking a sweat?

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

AP is reporting

SAO PAULO, Brazil (AP) – A woman in northeastern Brazil has given birth to what one doctor called a “giant baby,” a boy weighing 16.7 pounds.

Francisca Ramos dos Santos, 38, gave birth to the healthy boy named Ademilton on Tuesday at a hospital in Salvador, 900 miles northeast of Sao Paulo. He was the largest baby born at the Albert Sabin Maternity Hospital in its 12-year history, the hospital said. “Obviously the baby was born by Caesarean section,” hospital director Rita Leal said. “Both mother and baby are doing just fine.”

A C-section? Gee, ya think?

I mean, every bowling ball I’ve ever seen weighs less than this kid. I wanna see what this kid looks like in 20 years… but not in a dark alley, OK?

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

Leaving aside for the moment the (huge) issue of when life begins, I offer, two related thoughts on abortion, today, the first one having to do with the recent revelations of problems in the testing of some drugs such as the pain medications… (Vioxx, for example). The industry has been rocked by these recalls… Apparently the drugs were rushed through for whatever reason, if we take the word of the left which has been trying to nationalize healthcare for generations. (And let’s be nice guys and take their word for just the moment)

But I note that there is little if any question about such drugs as RU-486 being rushed through the same agency, the FDA, or of the distinct possibility of similarly disastrous results; indeed, a similar number of deaths are now on record, with a far smaller number of people taking said drug. Ever wonder why the different coverage?

On a similarly interesting note, we see the court system is slowly getting around to asking the questions others were asking three years ago; “But what of the health of the mother in an abortion situation?” (Speaking, this time of a ‘surgical abortion)

AP News is reporting that

Norma McCorvey, whose protest of Texas’ abortion ban led to the 1973 ruling, contends in a petition received at the court Tuesday that the case should be heard again in light of evidence that the procedure may harm women.

“Now we know so much more, and I plead with the court to listen for witnesses and re-evaluate Roe v. Wade,” said McCorvey, who says she now regrets her role in the case.

And in what must be a first, the courts are at last admitting there’s some validity to the case…. Enough to send it up to the USSC.

“…in a strongly worded concurrence, 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge Edith H. Jones criticized the abortion ruling and said new medical evidence may well show undue harm to a mother and her fetus.

The last major abortion decision by the Supreme Court came in 2000, when the court ruled 5-4 to strike down Nebraska’s ban on so-called “partial-birth” abortion because it failed to provide an exception to protect the mother’s health.

And this is interesting.  The court it seems to me, made it clear in the Nebraska Case, that they’re putting quite a lot of weight on the welfare of the mother. Which the case being brought by Norma McCorvey also does.  On that basis, this case will be heard; it’s a matter of when.

But it would also seem to weigh on the case of abortion drugs, ala RU486. Are drug companies willing to deal with the long trail of lawyers which will doubtless spring up out of holes in the ground once the connection is made between the abortion pill and any problems, subsequent to the fast tracking through the FDA…. The same fast tracking now being blamed for a lot of deaths of the Vioxx case?

In case you’re interested, there are several deaths on record with this drug. Deaths thusfar ignored.

Some bright legal beagle someplace is gonna pick up on this rather acute double standard… it’s just a matter of time… and the court is going to be forced to rule as such. And the McCovey case is one such opportunity.

No wonder the speakers at NARAL sounded so panicky the other day.

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

Inaugural Address by President George W. Bush

Vice President Cheney, Mr. Chief Justice, President Carter, President Bush, President Clinton, reverend clergy, distinguished guests, fellow citizens:

On this day, prescribed by law and marked by ceremony, we celebrate the durable wisdom of our Constitution, and recall the deep commitments that unite our country. I am grateful for the honor of this hour, mindful of the consequential times in which we live, and determined to fulfill the oath that I have sworn and you have witnessed.

At this second gathering, our duties are defined not by the words I use, but by the history we have seen together. For a half century, America defended our own freedom by standing watch on distant borders. After the shipwreck of communism came years of relative quiet, years of repose, years of sabbatical – and then there came a day of fire.

We have seen our vulnerability – and we have seen its deepest source. For as long as whole regions of the world simmer in resentment and tyranny – prone to ideologies that feed hatred and excuse murder – violence will gather, and multiply in destructive power, and cross the most defended borders, and raise a mortal threat. There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom.

We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.

America’s vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one. From the day of our Founding, we have proclaimed that every man and woman on this earth has rights, and dignity, and matchless value, because they bear the image of the Maker of Heaven and earth. Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave. Advancing these ideals is the mission that created our Nation. It is the honorable achievement of our fathers. Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation’s security, and the calling of our time.

So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.

This is not primarily the task of arms, though we will defend ourselves and our friends by force of arms when necessary. Freedom, by its nature, must be chosen, and defended by citizens, and sustained by the rule of law and the protection of minorities. And when the soul of a nation finally speaks, the institutions that arise may reflect customs and traditions very different from our own. America will not impose our own style of government on the unwilling. Our goal instead is to help others find their own voice, attain their own freedom, and make their own way.

The great objective of ending tyranny is the concentrated work of generations. The difficulty of the task is no excuse for avoiding it. America’s influence is not unlimited, but fortunately for the oppressed, America’s influence is considerable, and we will use it confidently in freedom’s cause.

My most solemn duty is to protect this nation and its people against further attacks and emerging threats. Some have unwisely chosen to test America’s resolve, and have found it firm.

We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right. America will not pretend that jailed dissidents prefer their chains, or that women welcome humiliation and servitude, or that any human being aspires to live at the mercy of bullies.

We will encourage reform in other governments by making clear that success in our relations will require the decent treatment of their own people. America’s belief in human dignity will guide our policies, yet rights must be more than the grudging concessions of dictators; they are secured by free dissent and the participation of the governed. In the long run, there is no justice without freedom, and there can be no human rights without human liberty.

Some, I know, have questioned the global appeal of liberty – though this time in history, four decades defined by the swiftest advance of freedom ever seen, is an odd time for doubt. Americans, of all people, should never be surprised by the power of our ideals. Eventually, the call of freedom comes to every mind and every soul. We do not accept the existence of permanent tyranny because we do not accept the possibility of permanent slavery. Liberty will come to those who love it.

Today, America speaks anew to the peoples of the world:

All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.

Democratic reformers facing repression, prison, or exile can know: America sees you for who you are: the future leaders of your free country.

The rulers of outlaw regimes can know that we still believe as Abraham Lincoln did: “Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it.”

The leaders of governments with long habits of control need to know: To serve your people you must learn to trust them. Start on this journey of progress and justice, and America will walk at your side.

And all the allies of the United States can know: we honor your friendship, we rely on your counsel, and we depend on your help. Division among free nations is a primary goal of freedom’s enemies. The concerted effort of free nations to promote democracy is a prelude to our enemies’ defeat.

Today, I also speak anew to my fellow citizens:

From all of you, I have asked patience in the hard task of securing America, which you have granted in good measure. Our country has accepted obligations that are difficult to fulfill, and would be dishonorable to abandon. Yet because we have acted in the great liberating tradition of this nation, tens of millions have achieved their freedom. And as hope kindles hope, millions more will find it. By our efforts, we have lit a fire as well – a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power, it burns those who fight its progress, and one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world.

A few Americans have accepted the hardest duties in this cause – in the quiet work of intelligence and diplomacy … the idealistic work of helping raise up free governments … the dangerous and necessary work of fighting our enemies. Some have shown their devotion to our country in deaths that honored their whole lives – and we will always honor their names and their sacrifice.

All Americans have witnessed this idealism, and some for the first time. I ask our youngest citizens to believe the evidence of your eyes. You have seen duty and allegiance in the determined faces of our soldiers. You have seen that life is fragile, and evil is real, and courage triumphs. Make the choice to serve in a cause larger than your wants, larger than yourself – and in your days you will add not just to the wealth of our country, but to its character.

America has need of idealism and courage, because we have essential work at home – the unfinished work of American freedom. In a world moving toward liberty, we are determined to show the meaning and promise of liberty.

In America’s ideal of freedom, citizens find the dignity and security of economic independence, instead of laboring on the edge of subsistence. This is the broader definition of liberty that motivated the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the G.I. Bill of Rights. And now we will extend this vision by reforming great institutions to serve the needs of our time. To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will bring the highest standards to our schools, and build an ownership society. We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance – preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen an agent of his or her own destiny, we will give our fellow Americans greater freedom from want and fear, and make our society more prosperous and just and equal.

In America’s ideal of freedom, the public interest depends on private character – on integrity, and tolerance toward others, and the rule of conscience in our own lives. Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self. That edifice of character is built in families, supported by communities with standards, and sustained in our national life by the truths of Sinai, the Sermon on the Mount, the words of the Koran, and the varied faiths of our people. Americans move forward in every generation by reaffirming all that is good and true that came before – ideals of justice and conduct that are the same yesterday, today, and forever.

In America’s ideal of freedom, the exercise of rights is ennobled by service, and mercy, and a heart for the weak. Liberty for all does not mean independence from one another. Our nation relies on men and women who look after a neighbor and surround the lost with love. Americans, at our best, value the life we see in one another, and must always remember that even the unwanted have worth. And our country must abandon all the habits of racism, because we cannot carry the message of freedom and the baggage of bigotry at the same time.

From the perspective of a single day, including this day of dedication, the issues and questions before our country are many. From the viewpoint of centuries, the questions that come to us are narrowed and few. Did our generation advance the cause of freedom? And did our character bring credit to that cause?

These questions that judge us also unite us, because Americans of every party and background, Americans by choice and by birth, are bound to one another in the cause of freedom. We have known divisions, which must be healed to move forward in great purposes – and I will strive in good faith to heal them. Yet those divisions do not define America. We felt the unity and fellowship of our nation when freedom came under attack, and our response came like a single hand over a single heart. And we can feel that same unity and pride whenever America acts for good, and the victims of disaster are given hope, and the unjust encounter justice, and the captives are set free.

We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom. Not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability; it is human choices that move events. Not because we consider ourselves a chosen nation; God moves and chooses as He wills. We have confidence because freedom is the permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the soul. When our Founders declared a new order of the ages; when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on liberty; when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner “Freedom Now” – they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty.

When the Declaration of Independence was first read in public and the Liberty Bell was sounded in celebration, a witness said, “It rang as if it meant something.” In our time it means something still. America, in this young century, proclaims liberty throughout all the world, and to all the inhabitants thereof. Renewed in our strength – tested, but not weary – we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom.

May God bless you, and may He watch over the United States of America.

# # #

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

I’ve changed my picture in the upper right profile corner to something about 14 years more recent. Wish I could say it looked better. Ah, well… that’s why I did good in radio…. As I used to tell my listeners, I’ve got a face made for radio.

New blogs in Bit’s Honor Roll:GOPbloggers, which basicly picks up where Blogs For Bush leaves off, after today. I’ll be adding myself to that circle as well when the time comes.
The Cocktail Hour joins us as well.

I’m experimenting with the E-Mail delivery system in Blogger. You may see a strange test entry or two over the next week or so while I get things squared away.

Finally, you’ll notice a new feature on all posts.
This is a little white square on the lower right of the closing box of each post. Clicking it brings up a mailing feature which you can use to e-mail that post to a freind. I’m adding this against my better judgement; I see it possibly bringing my hit rate down somewhat. But we’ll see how it goes.

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

The New York Post is reporting that:

But after members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Rice by a 16-2 vote yesterday and the full Senate prepared for a vote today, some vehemently anti-Bush Democrats suddenly served notice they wanted more time.

Republican sources identified the key holdouts as 87-year-old Robert Byrd of West Virginia, along with Ted Kennedy and John Kerry, both of Massachusetts.

Byrd, a former Ku Klux Klan member, has been one of the most vocal critics of Bush. Rice would be the first black woman to serve as secretary of state.

And yet, the Democrats cannot for the life of them understand why blacks are going Republican.

Explain to me how this isn’t the racism they would accuse Republicans of in the same situation. Or perhaps they’re simply being partisan pigs.

Or, more likely, both.

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

Wee keep hearing reports about a planned attack in the Boston area, from four individuals that snuck acorss the Mexican border. Drudge and Michele Malkin have been hot on it. But the best I’ve seen thusfar on this story is Winds of Change

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

FOXNews is reporting one of Moore’s bodyguards was arrested last night for a a felony charge of an unlicensed frearm.

Remember, gang, this is the moron that forced “Bowling for Columbine” down out throats and moaned endlessly about America’s “obsession with guns”.

Funny how this stuff never gets applied to THEM, huh?

Watch, though. He’ll get a pass from the libeal media. Indeed, I’m willing to bet Fox is the only outlet who will touch this story. If you find it elsewhere, drop a comment.

Tags:

Eric Florack on January 20th, 2005

The Scotsman is reporting this morning on a story I started hearing about yesterday.. and actually commented on at well, I forget where, actually….

“TSUNAMI-struck Thailand has been told by the European Commission that it must buy six A380 Airbus aircraft if it wants to escape the tariffs against its fishing industry.

While millions of Europeans are sending aid to Thailand to help its recovery, trade authorities in Brussels are demanding that Thai Airlines, its national carrier, pays £1.3 billion to buy its double-decker aircraft. “

So what’s this really all about?

While aid workers from across Europe are helping to rebuild Thai livelihoods, trade officials in Brussels are concluding a jets-for-prawns deal, which they had hoped to announce next month.

As the world’s largest producer of prawns, Thailand has become so efficient that its wares are half the price of those caught by Norway, the main producer of prawns for the EU.

Norway. Hmmm. Isn’t Jan Egeland from Norway?
Sounds rather….. ummmm… STINGY to me, ya know?

But of course they’ll get a pass on the world stage for this.
Can you imagine the reaction had the US tried to pull something of the like?

Tags: