Sarah Hoyt over at Instapundant, speaking as regards Governor DeSantis and his claim that Donald Trump’s claims of vote fraud didn’t prove true:
1- What we saw on election night 2020 is completely impossible without fraud. (BTW I personally know one of the poll watchers who was locked out of the polling place when the fraud happened.)
2- For it to not prove to be true, it would need to have been examined, in a rational way. Not you know, run the same faked ballots through the machines and announce all is honky dory. Also courts would have to give someone, even, you know, other states “standing” to challenge it.
3- given vote by mail every state or election goes left. It’s a miracle, right?
4- These people don’t behave like they won the election. Psychologically, if they knew they won, they would facilitate investigations and allow talk about it, as Bush and Trump did. They behave like con men who don’t
want the con discussed.
First, DeSantis claim that Trump’s charges didn’t prove true, especially now, strike me as doing the establishments work for it.
I’ve been saying for some time now that DeSantis is sounding another establishment critter, another George Bush, and guess what? He just sealed the deal.
Past that, every point she’s made here is important. The old saying goes the truth doesn’t mind being challenged by questions. Falsehood will fight against questions even being asked much less searching for the answers. Let anybody suggest that we do an election audit instead of simply rerunning the same balance through the machines and calling it done, and the Democrats start weeping for “our democracy”, and the establishment GOP allows that line to go um.
Both the Democrats and the establishment Republicans are acting as if they know very well that their position will not withstand such questions. That should concern every American. You can’t look at this sitrep and not know that there’s something desperately wrong with it.
As one commenter put it:
The fact that the “winners” are literally arresting people who sought an election audit is OVERWHELMING circumstantial evidence that the election audit would have revealed outcome determinative fraud.
Indeed.
