There’s Art, And There’s Art.

About this Chocolate Jesus thing that seems all the rage in Blogdom these last few days…

As a Christian, I must confess that I don’t find this all that disturbing. After all, this isn’t Christ stuffed into a bottle of Urine, or a statue made of cow poo, or something… which by the way I objected to at the time and still do. How is this statue more offensive than these other alleged works of art? What about the medium of Chocolate, is so offensive? I mean, if this was done in marble, would there be such an outcry?

The six-foot (1.8m) sculpture, entitled “My Sweet Lord”, depicts Jesus Christ naked on the cross.

Oh, I see. This one doesn’t have a loincloth. Perhaps Mr. Donahue would be so good is to explain to us where in the Bible and mentions the was wearing one?  Somehow I tend to doubt he would take me up on this.

Catholic League head Bill Donohue called it “one of the worst assaults on Christian sensibilities ever”.

Really? How?

“The fact that they chose Holy Week shows this is calculated, and the timing is deliberate,” Mr Donohue said.

..

Mr Semler said the timing of the exhibition was coincidental.

Even if the timing was not incidental, I still fail to see why the outrage. Certainly, there was one major idiot they could depend on to draw attention to the work.

My advice to Mr. Donahue is to reserve his rage for something that actually deserves it.   This ain’t it.

David and I have both expressed our reservations as regards John McCain… As a senator and as a Republican, much less as a Republican president.  Yet, the blind pig will find the acorn occasionally.

McCain’s people have got him started with a petition that actually contains some common sense.  On the other hand, this acorn is one that wasn’t all that hard to find. The petition runs thus::

The supplemental appropriations bill that passed the Senate on March 27, calling for a date certain withdrawal from Iraq, is nothing more than a guaranteed date of surrender.

It is a refusal to acknowledge the dire consequences of failure, in terms of the stability in the Middle East and the resulting impact on the security of all Americans, whether home or abroad.

Democrats have chosen the politically expedient position of failure rather than putting aside the small politics of the day in the interest of our nation and the values upon which this nation rests.

We the undersigned remain steadfast in our support for the war against terrorism and mindful of the consequences of failure in Iraq, even if Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid refuse to acknowledge those consequences.

We support our troops and the new strategy and believe it should be given the opportunity to succeed. American national security interests are directly at stake. Success or failure in Iraq is the transcendent issue for our foreign policy and our national security. People say they want to defeat the terrorists, but if we withdraw from Iraq prematurely, it will be the terrorists’ greatest triumph.

If we leave Iraq based on an artificial timetable, al Qaeda will be free to plan, train for and conduct operations from Iraq just as they did in Afghanistan before 9/11.

Signed, [YOUR NAME]

To be honest, I’ve been reluctant to post anything containing a link to any of his sights, for fear of you ending up on his mailing lists.  At the same time, when he gets one right, I can hardly turn away.

“The war’s being lost in Congress by the people who give aid and comfort to the enemies that are killing our troops.”

John Stevens, veteran United States Air Force, Korea, Vietnam. 

More, Don Surber. 

Gee.. McGehee…. Here, all this time I thought it was because you liked Bruce Willis Movies.

Islamofascist militants, posing as imans, seek to use American courts to terrorize American citizens:

MINNEAPOLIS -(AP)- Six Muslim men removed from a plane last fall after being accused of suspicious behavior are suing the airline and threatening to sue the passengers who complained — a move some fear could discourage travelers from speaking up when they see something unusual.

This is serious attempt by Islamic militants to escalate the terror war on the western world.   If this suit succeeds, it will result in American courts becoming a weapon to terrorize American citizens  The Islamist know that terror can not succeed if the victims fight back as the heros of Flight 93 did.  They want to make American afraid to fight back and to use our courts to do it.

Hey Cernig:

It’s ironic that big Rightwing blogs tend to be far more communal, more socialist, in their sharing of linkage while some of the big Lefties seem to want to be the new robber barons of the internet.

That’s not being socialist; that’s respecting the free flow of ideas… something socialism can NEVER do if it wants to survive.  And here’s a clue…THe American left, being socialist themselves, can’t either. Witness: Any movement away from the leftist dogma, is not tolerated.  That’s what’s going on, here, with these lefty blog purges.  Too bad you’re so steeped in it, that you can’t figure that one out.

In fairness, yours is a comment I would fully expect from someone who thinks socialism to be a good thing.  Ummmm… Just so you know…?  You’ve labeled yourself an idiot thereby.

Here’s the problem;

I have perhaps 40gb of MP3’s that live on my big server.  I’d like to separate them down to collection of 650mb or so, for the purpose of archiving them on CD in MP3 format. I mean, if I lose the drive in the server it’ll literally take me hundreds of hours to get this stuff back and organized the way I want them.

Before you start pushing me to utilities like WINACE or WINRAR,  the stipulation here is that they have to be an MP3 format in the output side, not  archived in any way, (such as Zip) so that I might play them on Mp3 disk players in both BitsBox and Donna’s car, as well.

Additionally, it would be nice if I could  keep the current folder setup that I’m using… (Genre/ Artist/ Album/ disk /cut without seperating albums. )

I do use WINAMP, so if there’s a plug in for that environment that I don’t know about, that would be helpful.

So Pelosi is now conducting her own foreign policy?

I mean, “fact finding” as she’s decided to label this, can be done from here. But butt-kissing is most effective in person.

Go ahead, people… and tell me about how this is the way forward.

Be sure to include the definition of ‘forward’  in context.

Good deal.

Ed, you and your lady continue to be in our prayers and good thoughts, here.

Watching Democrats try to assume the role of ‘most diplomatic’ is like witnessing a room full of cats in a barking class trying to make it through the first day. Except in this case, the participants are not even remotely funny.

Sister Toldjah. 

Me at Q&O, just now:

As for abuses of power by government and by police forces — yeah, those things are wrong and immoral and I oppose them. Despite false assertions by some, I certainly do not like ‘big government’!

Yet you fight for it, almost as a matter of instinct, at every chance you are given.

You seemingly rationalize doing wrong, because you claim it will reduce suffering… for example, supporting theft, to support ‘welfare’ spending. Big government, again… see? So much for honesty and so much for principles of freedom.

Your preening about ‘morality’ is utter nonsense, Erb, because the basis of morality to my mind is based first in honesty. You miss on both counts.

Your statement about big government and welfare is a primary example:

I simply find a working welfare state good for economic freedom

So, you don’t like ‘big government’, eh? What kind of government is it, do you suppose, that will be able to confiscate enough funds to support such a system? And what does such a system do to the economic freedom of the people whose money is stolen to support it?

There’s lots more there, of course.

But look; This guy calls himself a ‘libertarian’.  Apparently, the word means nothing, if his claim is true.

Well, welcome to ‘Words Mean Things.”

 I am reminded (by virtue of this happening at Q&O) that there was a similar discsussion about Henke, not many moons ago, as to his being a libertarian of any stripe. But I will say that there’s a lot of difference between Henke’s understanding of the word, and Erb’s. I’m all for the ‘big tent’, and certainly my definition of ‘neolib’ is big enough to include him… and Billy, for that matter, as I’ve said several times. I consdier the ideas of most libertarians to be strong enough to smooth over and eliminate by matters of reason and logic, most of the variences.

The differences between, say Billy and Henke, as I said when that argument was in full bloom, are in terms of pholosphy, fairly large.  But not insurmountable…there’s still walls on this tent.. there’s still a limit as to how far such definitions can be stretched. At least we’re talking about the same subject… there’s a basis of conversation.   Erb trying to lay claim to the title of ‘libertarian’ strikes me as blowing the walls off any meaningful definition of the word.

Now, I consider it an open question if this misdefinition is more by intent, or more a product of his worldview that there are no standards.

Senator Dianne Feinstien needs to resign from the Senate Rules committee, which oversees ethics reform.    A corrupt Senator, like Feinstien, is not fit to define what is ethical. 

As the now disgraces, chair of the Senate MILCON subcommittee Feinstien awarded over a billion dollars in contracts to husband’s companies.

Having Feinstein establish ethic rules would like letting John McCain define federal campaign laws.

[Voter Fraud] It’s just a myth, according to these guys.

Right.

Sister Toldjah. ?

Pigs of feather flock together.  Both Dennis Kucinich(D-Mars) and Rosie O’Donnell have joined the 9-11 Truthers.

From the Albany(NY) Times-Union:

He also said that as chairman of a House subcommittee on domestic policy, he plans to launch an investigation of “a narrow portion” of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He offered few details, but said his subcommittee would be looking at “a few, specific discrepancies in the public record.” The 9/11 Commission that published its final report in 2004 never resolved some conflicting facts, Kucinich said. He announced his own look at 9/11 in answer to a question from an audience member. The man complained that the 9/11 Commission was too tied to the Bush administration to offer an unbiased report, and Kucinich agreed

Rosie O’Donnell loses it from Allahpundit.

In fact, I suggest the Congressman Kucinich call O’Donnell as his witness.

More, Gateway Pundit, Atlas.

A scene right out of the old west, except it is not, burga clad women stormed a brothel and kidnapped the madam:

Islamabad – Female students at an Islamic school in the Pakistani capital freed an alleged brothel owner on Thursday after the woman donned a burqa and promised to shun “immoral acts”.

The details of the confession ring a bell, somehow.