Canada’s new law has been passed and is being sent to the CSC for vetting. The wording I found interesting was that marriage was defined as two people (no mention of sexual roles) “to the exclusion of all others”. Seems to me an open question, here. Do people who have an “open marriage” now complain that their chosen lifestyle is being now unconstitutional? “to the exclusion of all others” seems problematic for such people, no?
This will be challanged… and not by the right… but by people who will claim this doesn’t go far enough.
Tags: BitsBlog
