Trump Card, Donald Trump continues to play the role of useful idiot,from Newsmax:
Potential 2012 GOP presidential contender Donald Trump is doubling down on his call for President Barack Obama to produce a birth certificate, saying “facts are emerging” that have raised a “real question” as to whether Obama is constitutionally eligible to serve as president.
The president has spent “millions of dollars” in legal fees to “trying to get away from this issue,” Trump said.
I never had much use for Trump in the past, but you’ve got to hand it to him in this case. Instead of hunkering down and apologizing when called a racist, he has doubled down on his bet and even released his own birth certificate. What? A Republican who refuses to grovel before Jesse Jackson when called a racist?
Fighting the sexual revolution, and losing, revolution is a synonym for change, not necessarily improvement. Some change is not an improvement, Jill notes some of casualties of the sexual revolution, from Pundit & Pundette:
When the sexual revolution hit, young people were its victims as well as its proponents. And they knew very little about the consequences of what they were doing. Sex is powerful, though few outside of religious circles will tell you so. In the secular world it’s often promoted as mere recreation, a “fun” way to “unwind,” and the less personal the better.
Babs Boxer – Dog, tell Senator Barbara Boxer roll-over and she does, from Jennifer Steinhauer New York Times:
Moments before a conference call with reporters was scheduled to get underway on Tuesday morning, Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, apparently unaware that many of the reporters were already on the line, began to instruct his fellow senators on how to talk to reporters about the contentious budget process.
After thanking his colleagues — Barbara Boxer of California, Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, Thomas R. Carper of Delaware and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut — for doing the budget bidding for the Senate Democrats, who are facing off against the House Republicans over how to cut spending for the rest of the fiscal year, Mr. Schumer told them to portray John A. Boehner of Ohio, the speaker of the House, as painted into a box by the Tea Party, and to decry the spending cuts that he wants as extreme. “I always use the word extreme,” Mr. Schumer said. “That is what the caucus instructed me to use this week.”
[…]
“We are urging Mr. Boehner to abandon the extreme right wing,” said Ms. Boxer,
Mocking Media Splatters, Mark Hemingway mocks David Brock, of Media Splatters for American, from Weekly Standard:
But as Nietzsche once said, “At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid.” MMFA is really, really insipid.
I mean, as a professional journalist, I’m not sure how I feel about James O’Keefe’s methodology. But with a few hidden cameras and next to no money, he’s taking a wrecking ball to some of liberal America’s biggest institutions. MMFA blows $10 million a year and what do they have to show for it?
[…]
David Brock, who runs MMFA, appears to be really good at raising money, but terrible at media criticism. I can’t imagine he’s now going to succeed in his new mission of “sabotage,” either (though it’s not like MMFA has ever known the difference between honest critisicm and underhanded assualt). I can’t believe that MMFA continues to operate in the haphazard fashion that it does, and I can’t imagine that some on the left aren’t at least embarassed by how pathetic and ineffective it is.
George Soros really isn’t getting much for his money.
David Brock felon, while Hemingway was content to mock Brock, Mark Taspscott suggests that Brock is head of a criminal enterprise, from Washington Examiner:
Media Matters, the George Soros-backed legion of liberal agit-prop shock troops based in the nation’s capital, has declared war on Fox News, and in the process quite possibly stepped across the line of legality.
David Brock, MM’s founder, was quoted Saturday by Politico promising that his organization is mounting “guerrila warfare and sabotage” against Fox News, which he said “is not a news organization. It is the de facto leader of the GOP, and it is long past time that it is treated as such by the media, elected officials and the public.”
[…]
Being a C3 puts MM in the non-profit, non-commercial sector, and it also bars the organzation from participating in partisan political activity. This new, more aggressive stance, however, appears to run directly counter to the government’s requirements for maintaining a C3 tax status
MMFA isn’t just pledging to be a “watchdog.” They’re promising “sabotage,” which sounds less like investigative journalism and more like dirty tricks, aimed not at the reporting itself but at mid-level management at Fox. If that consists of the same kind of undercover videos produced by James O’Keefe at ACORN and NPR, that’s fair game; the media have used stings like those for decades. That’s hardly “sabotage,” though, which sounds like efforts at a completely different — and more base — level.
Elizabeth Taylor: Star, Celebrity, and Hero, I did not know. The late actress Elizabeth Taylor was a hero, from Big Peace:
A 1977 report by the JTA unearthed in the aftermath of Elizabeth Taylor’s death reveals that the actress, “…offered herself as a hostage for the more than 100 Air France hijack victims held by terrorists at Entebbe Airport in Uganda during the tense days before the Israeli rescue raid
[T]he decline of British civilization is reflected even more brutally in the rampaging mob that smashed store fronts, “occupied” businesses, and battled police. And perhaps most of all in the weak response of the authorities.
Community organizers are not compatible with civilization, at least as we know it.
Smart diplomacy, not, Mrs. Clinton telegraphs her intent. Smart diplomats, of whom Mrs. Clinton is not, disguise their nation’s intent. Mrs. Clinton green lights thugs, from Nicole Gaouette and Gopal Ratnam, Bloomberg:
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S. won’t enter into the internal conflict in Syria the way it has in Libya.
“No,” Clinton said, when asked on the CBS “Face the Nation” program if the U.S. would intervene in Syria’s unrest. Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad‘s security forces clashed with protesters in several cities yesterday after his promises of freedoms and pay increases failed to prevent dissent from spreading across the country.
[…]
“Each of these situations is unique,” Clinton said, referring to the Middle Eastern countries dealing with change and unrest, a list that now includes Yemen, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Syria and Bahrain.
The key word here being unique, a new Obami euphemism for arbitrary, like Obama Care waivers.
No shit Dumbo, is anybody surprised by these other than maybe Mrs. Clinton, from Telegraph (UK)?
Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links
Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.
For nearly 20 years, we’ve willfully blinded ourselves to the Rosetta Stone that decodes our enemy’s war doctrine. But the jihad (or shall we call it “kinetic Islam”?) is catalyzed not by al-Qaeda but by sharia — by Muslim law. So is the “Arab Spring,” now playing in Tripoli (and elsewhere) after rave reviews in Cairo.
How leftared do you have to be, to believe that a man with no paper trail who barely able to talk without the aid of teleprompter is even capable of writing a literary master piece?
As gas prices rose in 2008, network reporters mentioned President Bush in 15 times as many stories than they brought up President Obama in a similar period in 2011.
Bush drew gallons of coverage in 2008. Comparing a 20-day span of rising gas prices in 2008 to 24 days of rising prices in February 2011, the Business & Media Institute found the networks did more than 2 ½ times as many stories during the Bush years versus Obama.
Unrest in the Mideast has hit American consumers hard, driving up gas prices that had already been above $3-a-gallon since Dec. 23. The national average for gasoline hit $3.36 on Feb. 28, the highest ever for the month of February according to The Associated Press. But the amount of network news coverage of rising gas prices did not reflect it.
All three broadcast networks together averaged just one story about rising gas prices per day. In contrast, when gas prices rose similarly in 2008, the networks averaged more than one story, per network, per day.
In contrast, says Seymour:
In contrast to the 15 reports referencing the Bush administration when gas prices were “through the roof,” the only 2011 story to mention the president was NBC “Nightly News” on Feb. 24. Tom Costello’s report on the impact of surging gas prices quoted President Obama who was “optimistic.”
Obama said, “We actually think that we’ll be able to ride out the Libya situation and it will stabilize.” Costello didn’t question the president’s statement or mention any of the administration’s policies that will constrict the supply of oil and gasoline and could further increase the price of gasoline for consumers.
What we have, in spite of the rhetoric of Obama and company about “real leadership” is a lack of acknowledgement from Obama and his his freinds in the press, that there has been no real leadership on energy at all, and that this administration’s policies have been detrimental to our country on a scale that can only be described as monumental.
Forgetting the price of gasoline for the moment, have you seen the price of Diesel? In case you don’t know, it’s going up faster than gas. And lest you think Diesel prices don’t affect you, do yourself a favor and try to find something you own or that you consume that isn’t delivered by means of fuel oil. Does anyone think for a moment, that the price increases we’re seeing are not going to be borne by every consumer in the country? How does that mesh with the supposed efforts at economic recovery?
Now, these are all points that would be argued by a press that is trying to tag a supposed conservative….. Bush, or any other target of the left…. with one thing or another. As usual, the leftists running the press are selective in their “reporting”. Big shock, huh?
It all seems rather mad, doesn’t it? The decision to become involved militarily in the Libyan civil war couldn’t take place within a less hospitable context. The U.S. is reeling from spending and deficits, we’re already in two wars, our military has been stretched to the limit, we’re restive at home, and no one, really, sees President Obama as the kind of leader you’d follow over the top. “This way, men!” “No, I think I’ll stay in my trench.” People didn’t hire him to start battles but to end them. They didn’t expect him to open new fronts. Did he not know this?
President often have to change course after they are elected. Dubya didn’t run to become a war president, but when he did, he explained why he did. Where Obama, who was hailed during the campaign as great orator, has now become tongue tied.
Dumbo channels B.J. Clinton, B.J. Clinton was most noted for parsing the meaning of the word “is.” The Obami attempt to emulate B.J. by parsing the word war, from Byron York, Washington Examiner:
In the last few days, Obama administration officials have frequently faced the question: Is the fighting in Libya a war? From military officers to White House spokesmen up to the president himself, the answer is no. But that leaves the question: What is it?
In a briefing on board Air Force One Wednesday, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes took a crack at an answer. “I think what we are doing is enforcing a resolution that has a very clear set of goals, which is protecting the Libyan people, averting a humanitarian crisis, and setting up a no-fly zone,” Rhodes said. “Obviously that involves kinetic military action, particularly on the front end.”
[T]he Pentagon uses the term “kinetic” to differentiate between violent action and other military operations, such as cyberwarfare or roles strictly relating to logistics and support. They don’t use it as a euphemism for war, but suddenly the Obama administration has adopted it for that very purpose.
It’s not the first euphemism for war that the White House has introduced, either. Almost two years ago, the administration announced that they would abandon the phrase “global war on terror” and replace it with “overseas contingency operations.” Unfortunately, not all terrorist attacks happened overseas, as the Fort Hood shooting, the attempt to blow up Times Square, and the Underwear Bomber proved. In case that term didn’t prove elastic enough, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano introduced “man-caused disasters” to replace “terrorist attack.”
Strother Martin explains Dumbo’s Libyan problem, video:
Sure, Elizabeth Taylor is not dead. Rather she has merely experienced a non-temporary cessation life functions.
Comments closed, and will remain closed until we can get the spam filters fixed.
As this is written, I’m at a warehouse in Long Island, about to leave for home. An unusually long week, this, but it’s had it’s rewards. I’ve spent the majority of the week running between East Central PA and Long Island. I saw Lady Liberty and the Brooklyn Bridge in my travels. I’m considering bringing the family down for a look around.
“Peter Beinart: “America Doesn’t Matter Anymore.” By the way, just to give you more details on who he is. He’s a senior political writer for the Daily Beast, associate professor of journalism and political science at the City University of New York, senior fellow at the New America Foundation. He first rose to national acclaim being an editor at New Republic, and he’s had a couple of books, and of course you can follow him on Twitter and Facebook. And of course he’s a leftist. “America Doesn’t Matter Anymore,” is the title of his piece. “As Europe takes the lead on the Libyan intervention, it’s a powerful signal of America’s weakening global influence. Peter Beinart on Obama’s Jeffersonian turn — and the end of an empire.” And they’re happy about this, even calling it Jeffersonian.
……
The American public’s appetite for humanitarian war has always been meager. And now the American government’s capacity for waging it is meager, too. … Whether they’ll be able to — whether they have the capacity and stomach for what it would take to push Gaddafi from power — is another question. But it’s not surprising that Barack Obama is giving them a chance to try,” meaning the Europeans. “Obama is what you might call a roundabout Jeffersonian. Jeffersonians, to borrow Walter Russell Mead’s phrase, believe that preserving America’s economic and political solvency requires reining in American empire.” Mr. Beinart, do you actually believe that is what this is about? Do you actually believe that Obama’s reluctance to get involved here is to save our economy? Where do these people live? Intellectually, where do they live to come up with this idea that Obama’s reluctance is to save our economy? It’s an economy that he has under assault. Obama’s boys read this, “America Doesn’t Matter Anymore, the end of an empire,” that’s victory for them.
Rush, Buddy… look, I love ya… but you’ve missed something rather crucial, here. This line of his is central to anyone who is, as Beinart is, a committed one-worlder…. and who has for decades subscribed to the line that the economic weakness in America is not it’s (demonstrably larger and mosre costly) socialist giveaway programs, but it’s military power. Everything else follows that in that line of non-thought of his.
The allusions for Jefferson are of course, bread and butter to the left who for some strange reason do not and never have understood the fact that Jefferson would denounce the politics of the party that invokes him as a party icon. It’s all image, as you know full well.
I note Syria is acting in a manner that would gather kinetic military action…. So why are we removing Quack Daffy, again?
I can add nothing ton the words of the good Doctor Krauthammer, so I’ll simply pass along the link.
Geraghty’s Law: either the Constitution changed between the time that Barack Hussien Obama was a candidate for president and when took the oath of office, or more likely Geraghty’s Law remains in effect. Obama Question and Answer by Charlie Savage, Boston Herald.
In what circumstances, if any, would the president have constitutional authority to bomb Iran without seeking a use-of-force authorization from Congress? (Specifically, what about the strategic bombing of suspected nuclear sites — a situation that does not involve stopping an IMMINENT threat?)
The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.
As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent. History has shown us time and again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the Legislative branch. It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action.
3) “and you have an international or multilateral support”
4) “Go for it.”
That pesty condition three, international, read United Nations, support, will rule ever having to come to the aid Israel. You know those darn Jews with the gall to attempt to live in their historic homeland.
As for me, I’ll start to believe that Dumbo, Barack Obama, accepts Responsibility to Protect (R2P) when he launches cruise missiles at aborturiums.
Gloria Allred — Whore, Gloria Allred debases herself and her professed profession, from Mike Cole, NESN:
Hat tip photo: Zambio
Not long after sentencing, the lawyers on both sides of the Lawrence Taylor case were back at it, but surprisingly, the former New York Giants linebacker didn’t have much to do with it.Taylor was sentenced to six years probation after pleading guilty to sexual misconduct and patronizing an underaged prostitute, but it was the two lawyers that stole the show following sentencing on Tuesday.
The problems started after star attorney Gloria Allred revealed her client, Christina Fierro, to the press following the sentencing. Fierro then proceeded to deliver a teary-eyed response to the verdict. It was the first time she had been revealed to the media, as both sides had done their best to keep her name a secret
I am pretty sure there is one whore in the above picture, and she on the left.
I think it safe to say that with policy disasters both on the foreign and the domestic fronts, and no real advances for American interests at home or abroad, that Jimmy Carter is no longer the worst President in American History.
Kinetic Action? The Obama Klan is so busy trying to not say they’re involved in a war in Libya, that they’re making up stuff to call it. Meanwhile the nleft is going after him as they did Bush. The honeymoon is over, dear friends and we have a one term president on our hands.
Dumbo’s Disaster, Victor Davis Hanson on what it wrong with Barack Obama’s war of choice on Libya, from National Review:
4) Aims and Objectives: Fact: We are now and then bombing Libyan ground targets in order to enhance the chances of rebel success in removing or killing Qaddafi. Fiction: We are not offering ground support but only establishing a no-fly zone, and have no desire to force by military means Qaddafi to leave. Questions: Is our aim, then, a reformed Qaddafi? A permanently revolutionary landscape? A partitioned, bisected nation? What is the model? Afghanistan? Mogadishu? The 12-year no-fly-zone in Iraq? A Mubarak-like forced exile? Who are the rebels? Westernized reformers? Muslim Brotherhood types? A mix? Who knows? Who cares?
VDH lists six more reasons.
Dumbo loses Stewart, you know Dumbo’s Disaster in Libya is going bad went both George Will and John Stewart are hitting from the same side. From Hat tip: Jennifer Rubin, Washington Post
President Obama has been alternating between ignoring the Libya war and denying there is one. His latest utterance underscores the administration’s muddled approach:
[…]
We are leading, that is coordinating, the effort, and our failure to remove Moammar Gaddafi will be a defeat for America, not simply for Obama’s beloved “international community.”
And frankly, when a liberal president loses Jon Stewart, something’s really gone off the rails:
Men, women, different, Mother Nature is not a feminist, from Heather Wilhelm, RCP:
Women are likely going nuts for a number of reasons. For instance, it’s quite tiring and stressful, not to mention impossible, to try to have the brilliant job, the perfect family, shiny hair and manicured hands. Some women say they want total “equality” but still want guys to pick up the check. But perhaps another reason women are losing it is that they’re repeatedly told that they’re no different than men-and many believe it, particularly in the realm of sex.
This, of course, is clearly not true. Not in the realm of biology, as “Manning Up” reminds us; not in the realm of emotional health-a new book, “Premarital Sex in America,” details the heightened correlation between female promiscuity and depression; and not even in terms of interpersonal communication. The irony is that many of the “empowered” true believers, certain we’re all androgynous frat boys now, often end up catering to the child-man’s every whim.
Equality and fairness are words and not a biological concepts.
“We do not provide close air support for the opposition forces. We protect civilians.” So says Gen. Carter Ham, head of Africa Command, who is apparently running the war in Libya at least for the moment. My question is: why on earth not? The best bet for toppling Qaddafi is to combine coalition airpower with rebel ground attacks: the same formula that worked in Kosovo in 1999 and in Afghanistan in 2001. Why aren’t we doing the same thing in Libya?
Let an old flyboy educate you Max, Close Air Support requires Forward Air Controllers. While I am not opposed to putting some officer in the line of fire, to do so would require forces on the ground in Libya, which so far beyond the limits of what the Obami brain trust, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Bacack Obama has promised.
Will Power, George Will destroys Barack Obama’s Mrs. Clintno’s.
Where arth thou Mrs. Shehan, John Hawkin explores the mystery of the peace dog which did not bark, from Townhall:
It seems like it was just yesterday when we had an “imperialist warmonger” in the White House who was going to be replaced by a peace-loving Democrat who promised “hope” and “change” instead. It’s funny how that worked out, isn’t it? We still have troops in Iraq, we’ve escalated the war in Afghanistan, and now we’re bombing everything that moves in Libya. Yet, the same liberals who were protesting in the streets and calling George Bush a war criminal have mostly been meek and quiet about the fact that the President they supported has been following in George Bush’s footsteps.
So, the obvious question is, “Did you lefties believe ANY of the crap you were spewing about the war on terrorism before Obama got into office?”
8. Where are the human shields?
Professor Williams holds class, Walter E. Williams takes to teaching basic economic, to those who should know better, from Creators:
Economic lunacy abounds, and often the most learned, including Nobel Laureates, are its primary victims. The most recent example of economic lunacy is found in a Huffington Post article titled “The Silver Lining of Japan’s Quake” written by Nathan Gardels, editor of New Perspectives Quarterly, who has also written articles for The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, New York Times and Washington Post.
Note that Doctor Williams is not citing some radical new and novel theory, The economist Doctor Williams cites, Frederic Bastiat, died in 1850. Shame supposed economists like Paul Krugman never studies, or forgot, Bastiat.
A thug by any other name, SEIU thugs storm bank, from Jason Mattera, Human Events:
Now comes a story from northeast Pennsylvania, where hordes of Service Employees International Union (SEIU) fanatics stormed a bank demanding to speak to its CEO. When the request was rebuffed, the hooligans erupted into the mindless chants of “Respect our vote” and “We’ll be back.”
Private sector unions don’t benefit by killing the companies which employ them. Public sector unions have no such restraint.
Susan Rice did a remarkable job at the UN. No one could have predicted, even critics of the policy could not predict such a muscular resolution being approved and the abstensions from Russia and China. This came much faster than anyone expected. And came with some very adept diplomacy….
The problem that the President has in projecting American values is that he first of all believes in a a multi-lateralist policy. Now on that score he has really accomplished that. This was pretty remarkable – bringing this whole coalition together and getting the Arab League.
Andi dear, the secret not building a coalition. Both Bush’s Forty-One and Forty-Three assembled multination coalitions. The difference is that the Bush’s kept their coalitions together, from Deborah Pasmantier, Age(AU):
While the US-French-British core stayed solid, cracks started to show Monday in the military coalition hastily assembled to take action on Libya as the Arab League and some EU countries wavered.
Criticism of the operation came swiftly after French jets took to the skies on Saturday to launch the first air strikes on Libyan targets in support of UN Security Council Resolution 1973.
Don’t count your coalitions before the peace treaty is signed.
Would you believe that while Bit was trucking, I managed to recruit a new writer? Well anyhow, without further introduction, I give you maiden post of Bitsblog’s neweset writer:
I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Suzan Rice and Hillary Clinton and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.
What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Bill Daley to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income?—?to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.
That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.
Now let me be clear?—?I suffer no illusions about Moammar Gadhafi. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.
He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.
But I also know that Gadhafi poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Libyian economy is in shambles, that the Libyian military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.
I know that even a successful war against Libya will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.
I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.
Dumbo’s Libyan Dodo riles “Rats, liberal democrat congresscritters riled by Barack Obama war on Libya, from:John Bresnahan and Johnathan Allen, Politico:
A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday.
Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part.
A self-profession professor or constitutional law ought to be able to explain the constitutional basis for wagin war on Libya without Congress consent, invoking the War Powers Act or declaring the action to self-defense. To date,. Obama has done none of the preceding and has flown the coop to Brazil rather than do his constitutional duty.
Honey Where is My Viagra Award, where Politico finds elected representatives who question the constitutionality of Dumbo’s War on Libya, Hill only finds certified dingbats, like Ralph Nader and Micheal Moore, from Hill:
Former presidential candidate Ralph Nader says that President Obama should be impeached for committing war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The consumer advocate and former presidential candidate said in an interview that aired Friday that Obama has committed “war crimes” on the same level as President Bush.
[…]
Anti-war filmmaker Michael Moore sharply criticized the president’s authorization of military strikes in Libya and a cadre of liberal House Democrats are questioning the constitutionality of the Libya operation.
Nader is two all beef patties short of a Big Mac and Moore has never pass up on one. Hill by only naming wacko’s as opposing Dumbo’s War on Libya is attempting to marginalize Dumbo’s opposition.
